Market
Crypto Phishing Losses Exceed $800 Million in 2024

Giggle Academy, an educational initiative launched by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, was a victim of a cyberattack that compromised its official X account (formerly Twitter). This resulted in the distribution of phishing links and false information.
This incident comes as the emerging industry deals with the scourge of phishing attacks, which have led to substantial losses for users.
Giggle Academy’s Hack Reinforces Growing Phishing Attack Threats
On November 16, Zhao confirmed a breach on Giggle Academy’s X account and cautioned the community against interacting with the compromised account. The attackers falsely claimed a “new CEO” had been appointed and shared phishing links to lure victims into verifying this fabricated announcement.
Giggle Academy provides free online courses covering grades 1 to 12, focusing on core subjects and additional topics such as emotional intelligence, finance, and blockchain. Its mission centers on supporting underserved communities with accessible education.
The Giggle Academy breach underscores the growing phishing problem in the blockchain industry. This year alone, phishing-related losses have surpassed $800 million. Blockchain security firm CertiK attributes this surge to increasingly sophisticated techniques like wallet draining and address poisoning.

CertiK’s data reveals 247 phishing incidents recorded in 2024. The first quarter saw the highest number of attacks, with 82 cases, while Q2 and Q3 recorded 67 and 65 incidents, respectively. Q4 has already logged 33 cases, despite only being midway through.
Although Q1 experienced the most attacks, Q2 led in total losses, with over $433 million stolen. Losses in Q3 reached $343 million, while Q1 accounted for $67 million. Despite fewer incidents in Q4 so far, the monetary impact is on track to surpass early-year figures.
CertiK highlights a shift in phishing methods, with hackers increasingly employing advanced tools. Wallet-draining techniques, originally popularized by Ice Phishing, are becoming more potent. In such scams, users are tricked into granting token-spending permissions to malicious actors.
Modern variants combine these methods with additional draining tools, such as Angel Drainer and Pink Drainer. Angel Drainer’s recent acquisition of Inferno Drainer highlights the growing prevalence of such tools in phishing campaigns.
Another rising threat is address poisoning, where scammers create fake wallet addresses resembling legitimate ones. They then send scam tokens to victims, hoping to manipulate transaction histories. When users attempt to interact with a familiar address, they may accidentally transact with a fake one instead.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Hill Rejects Interest-Bearing Stablecoins Despite Armstrong’s Wish

Representative French Hill, who Chairs the House Committee on Financial Services, rejected requests to approve interest-bearing stablecoins. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made a public appeal in support of this yesterday.
Hill has been a vocal supporter of new stablecoin regulations, and the crypto industry counted his Committee appointment as a victory.
French Hill Rejects Interest-Bearing Stablecoins
If there’s one topic that’s a top priority for US crypto policy, it’d be stablecoin regulations. Significant momentum is building behind pro-industry regulations, and President Trump claimed that stablecoins will play a role in dollar dominance. However, Representative French Hill pushed back on one request, saying he opposes interest-bearing stablecoins:
“I hear the point of view, but I don’t think that there’s consensus among the parties or the Houses [of Congress] on having a dollar-backed payment stablecoin pay interest to the holder of that stablecoin,” Hill told reporters earlier today.
Although Hill portrayed this position on stablecoins as a common-sense viewpoint, it represents a limit to the crypto industry’s political influence. When Hill was chosen to head the House Committee on Financial Services, crypto took it as a big win. Further, he’s been a visible presence in the fight for stablecoin regulation. So, what’s the problem?
Essentially, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made an appeal to Hill and other legislators regarding interest-bearing stablecoins. Just yesterday, Armstrong called this policy a “win-win” and a huge opportunity to help consumers and the economy.
“US stablecoin legislation should allow consumers to earn interest on stablecoins. The government shouldn’t put it’s thumb on the scale to benefit one industry over another. Banks and crypto companies alike should both be allowed to, and incentivized to, share interest with consumers. This is consistent with a free market approach,” Armstrong claimed.
Since Armstrong made this public appeal yesterday, it’s remarkable that Hill rejected his vision of stablecoins so quickly. Ostensibly, Armstrong’s political influence has been on the rise, as he played a prominent role in Trump’s Crypto Summit, and the SEC dropped its suit against Coinbase.
It’s an important fact for the US crypto industry to learn: no matter how quickly its influence is growing, it’s still very new to most people. Earlier this year, a string of state-level Bitcoin Reserve proposals failed in Republican-controlled states. President Trump may support crypto, but his supporters have limits.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
How Did UPCX Lose $70 Million in a UPC Hack?

UPCX suffered a major hack today, with 18.4 million UPC tokens stolen from its management accounts. This amounts to about $70 million dollars, and the price of UPC fell drastically.
The hackers stole more UPC than is currently circulating in the markets and haven’t offloaded any assets yet. It is unclear who did this or how they will be able to secure their gains in other assets.
UPCX Suffers Major Hack
Cyvers, a crypto security firm that has tracked and uncovered several major crimes, identified a serious hack this morning. Multiple suspicious transactions took place involving UPCX’s management account, and the firm acknowledged suspicious activity. UPCX didn’t go into great detail, only describing a few security measures, but Cyvers showed the extent of the hack:
“It appears that someone gained access to the address 0x4C….3583E, upgraded the ‘ProxyAdmin’ contract, and executed the ‘withdrawByAdmin’ function, resulting in the transfer of 18.4 million UPC (approximately $70 million) from three different management accounts,” Cyvers claimed via social media.
UPCX is an open-source crypto payment system, and this hack may represent a serious blow to the company. According to CoinGecko data, the hackers stole significantly more UPC tokens than are currently available, which is around 4 million. Naturally, this caused the price to drop significantly, in an immediate drop of over 4%:

Although a $70 million hack will certainly damage UPCX individually, it’s unclear if it will actually impact the broader market much. The largest hack in crypto history took place a little over a month ago, and the community is still assessing the fallout. Meanwhile, UPCX is comparatively tiny; less than 10,000 X users viewed its post admitting to the security breach.
Since the UPCX hack took place, the recipient account hasn’t moved any of its UPC tokens. Indeed, it may be difficult for the perpetrator to convert these assets into usable fiat in the first place. If the hackers stole nearly 5x the amount of UPC tokens in circulation, any attempt to liquidate them will crash UPC’s token price even further.
Ultimately, the UPCX hack is strange for several reasons. Despite a large dollar amount, it hasn’t attracted a huge amount of buzz or impacted the market outside UPC. Hopefully, further analysis will identify the perpetrators, and possibly freeze the assets. Otherwise, the threat of a future sale could hamper UPC’s recover for the foreseeable future.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Struggles to Break Out as Bear Trend Fades

Ethereum (ETH) enters the week with mixed signals as traders brace for tomorrow’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement, a potential macro catalyst that could impact risk assets. While the BBTrend indicator remains deeply negative, it’s beginning to ease, hinting at a possible slowdown in bearish momentum.
On-chain data shows a slight uptick in whale accumulation, suggesting cautious optimism from large holders. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s EMA setup shows early signs of a trend reversal, but the price still needs to break key resistance levels to confirm a shift in direction.
ETH BBTrend Is Easing, But Still Very Negative
Ethereum’s BBTrend indicator is currently reading -11.66, slightly improved from -12.54 the day before, but still in negative territory for the second consecutive day.
The Bollinger Band Trend (BBTrend) measures the strength and direction of a trend based on how price interacts with the upper and lower Bollinger Bands.
A positive BBTrend suggests bullish momentum, with the price expanding toward the upper band, while a negative BBTrend indicates bearish momentum, with the price leaning toward the lower band. Typically, a value beyond 10 is considered a strong trend signal, making the current -11.66 reading a sign of continued downside pressure.

The persistent negative BBTrend suggests that Ethereum remains in a short-term bearish phase, with sellers still dominating the price action.
While yesterday’s slight uptick hints at a potential slowing of downward momentum, the indicator remains well below the neutral zone, meaning any reversal is still unconfirmed, despite Ethereum flipping Solana in DEX trading volume for the first time in 6 months.
Traders may interpret this as a warning to stay cautious, especially if ETH continues hugging the lower Bollinger Band. For now, price action remains fragile, and any bounce will need to be supported by a decisive shift in volume and sentiment to signal a meaningful reversal.
Ethereum Whales Are Accumulating Again
The number of Ethereum whales—wallets holding between 1,000 and 10,000 ETH—has ticked up slightly, rising from 5,322 to 5,330 in the past 24 hours.
While this is a modest increase, whale activity remains one of the most closely watched on-chain metrics, as these large holders often influence market direction. Whales’ accumulation can signal growing confidence in Ethereum’s medium—to long-term prospects, especially during periods of price uncertainty or consolidation.
Conversely, a decline in whale addresses typically suggests weakening conviction or profit-taking.

Although the recent uptick is a positive sign, it’s important to note that the current number of Ethereum whales is still below the levels observed in prior weeks.
This means that while some large holders may be re-entering the market, the broader whale cohort has yet to fully commit to an accumulation phase.
If the upward trend in whale numbers continues, it could support a bullish shift in sentiment and price. However, for now, the data points to cautious optimism rather than a decisive reversal.
Will Ethereum Break Above $2,100 Soon?
Ethereum’s EMA lines are showing early signs of a potential trend reversal, with price action attempting to break above key short-term averages.
If Ethereum price can push through the resistance at $1,938, it may signal the start of a broader recovery, potentially targeting the next resistance levels at $2,104, and if momentum builds—especially with supportive macro catalysts—increasing toward $2,320 and even $2,546.

On the flip side, if Ethereum fails to maintain its upward push and bearish momentum resumes, the focus will shift back to downside levels.
The first key support sits at $1,823; a break below that could expose Ethereum to further losses toward $1,759.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Market23 hours ago
Coinbase Tries to Resume Lawsuit Against the FDIC
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Charles Hoskinson Reveals How Cardano Will Boost Bitcoin’s Adoption
-
Market22 hours ago
Hedera (HBAR) Bears Dominate, HBAR Eyes Key $0.15 Level
-
Market24 hours ago
BlackRock’s Larry Fink Thinks Crypto Could Harm The Dollar
-
Altcoin24 hours ago
Ethereum Bitcoin Ratio Drops to Record Low, What Next for ETH?
-
Market21 hours ago
This is Why PumpSwap Brings Pump.fun To the Next Level
-
Market20 hours ago
Cardano (ADA) Whales Hit 2-Year Low as Key Support Retested
-
Altcoin14 hours ago
A Make or Break Situation As Ripple Crypto Flirts Around $2