Connect with us

Regulation

Ripple CLO Breaks Down Next Steps In US SEC vs XRP Appeal

Published

on


Ripple Labs Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty has shared the developments of next steps that are to be taken in the ongoing lawsuit between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This case was filed in 2020 and focuses on the characterization of the XRP as a security, and whether Ripple conducted the sales of this token without registering them under the laws of the United States. As the legal fight enters the appeals stage, the firm and the US SEC prepare for a drawn-out process that could extend into 2026.

Ripple CLO Breaks Down Next Steps In US SEC vs XRP

Alderoty outlined the next stages of the appeal process at the agency’s annual Swell conference, explaining the basis of the agency’s appeal and Ripple’s cross-appeal. Stuart Alderoty said that the SEC has to file Form C, indicating what it wants to prosecute, by October 16, 2024. 

In two weeks, the firm will file its own Form C, which will present the company’s cross-appeal. The company has said that it plans to challenge the specific provisions of the original decision that held that certain institutional XRP sales constituted unregistered securities transactions.

After presenting Form Cs, the parties will then schedule when they will brief. The first brief by the US SEC is due in 90 days, and the commission is expected to present its legal points. Stuart Alderoty noted that the agency is expected to take the full 90 days, which means that the SEC’s first brief submission will be due mid-January 2025. The company will then file its response, followed by its own brief. This process, which includes several cycles of briefing and reply, is expected to continue until the middle of 2025.

Confidence in the Second Circuit

However, Stuart Alderoty was optimistic that the company is on stronger legal ground given the long time frame. In his speech at the Swell conference and other interviews, he said that Ripple is even more confident in its position in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit than it was in the Southern District of New York.

”We think this appeal will blow up in the SEC’s face,” Alderoty said, noting that the majority of the appeals in the Second Circuit do not lead to reversals of the district court’s decisions, but rather affirmations of such decisions. 

He pointed out that the SEC’s attempt to seek clarification through this appeal could positively impact the whole cryptocurrency space as the ruling will set a legal precedence.

Ripple’s Cross-Appeal Focuses on Institutional Sales

Ripple’s cross-appeal will only be on the part of the judgment of Judge Analisa Torres where she found that institutional sales of XRP by the company were a violation of the securities laws. While Judge Torres ruled that retail sales of XRP did not constitute unregistered securities offerings, she ruled against Ripple on institutional sales. 

The company will argue that these institutional sales did not involve “investment contracts” because they lacked specific rights and obligations, a key legal factor in determining whether a financial product is a security under U.S. law.

Alderoty explained that the firm is aiming for a legal precedent that clarifies this distinction. “We think that’s a fundamental rule of law that needs to be recognized,” he said, noting that trial courts have been reluctant to go that far in their interpretations. Nevertheless, the Ripple CLO acknowledged that the Second Circuit’s ruling could bring much-needed clarity, regardless of which side prevails.

In addition to its ongoing legal battle with the SEC, the company continues expanding its operations globally. At the Swell event, the firm also discussed the launch of its new stablecoin, RLUSD, a dollar-denominated token designed to enable faster and cheaper cross-border payments. The stablecoin is set to be issued under New York’s strict regulatory framework, which could give it an advantage in regulatory compliance, especially in an environment where other stablecoins face increased scrutiny.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

UK Exposes TikTok As Potential Unregulated Crypto Platform

Published

on

By


TikTok has come under scrutiny after being accused of potentially operating as an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange in the UK. The allegations were made public by the US attorney’s office in a letter sent to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) from a former compliance consultant for a leading private bank.

The letter claims that TikTok’s reward system may allow users to indirectly exchange virtual currency for fiat, raising concerns about the platform’s compliance with financial regulations.

UK Exposes TikTok As Potential Unregulated Crypto Platform

The accusations center around TikTok’s virtual currency, TikTok Coins, which can be bought by users and used to send virtual gifts to content creators. These gifts are then converted into diamonds, which creators can cash out for real money. 

However, the former compliance consultant argues that this system facilitates money transmission and the exchange of crypto-like assets without the necessary licensing from the FCA.

The letter recommends that the uk should regulate TikTok under the anti-money laundering and terrorist financing law Act due to its current structure posing a high risk. The worries suggest that TikTok may facilitate financial transactions that can avoid oversight, including swapping virtual coins for fiat currency.

Concerns Over Anti-Money Laundering Regulations

The complaint also argues that TikTok’s system may not even have adequate anti-money laundering (AML) controls in place. In the letter, the FCA also warned that the platform could be used for money laundering or other criminal purposes if it is not properly registered with the FCA. 

If the FCA steps in, the platform’s financial activities may be audited, especially concerning the virtual currency system and the regulations on digital currencies and money transmission services.

Though TikTok coins cannot be considered as cryptocurrency in a strict sense, their application in exchange for other virtual assets and their further exchange for fiat money raises questions on the legal framework of tokens. This lack of clear structure of the system leads to the questions of how the application of TikTok meets the current laws on finance in the UK.

Previous Legal Scrutiny and Investigations

TikTok has come under legal scrutiny in the past as well. The platform is also under investigation in Australia where the authorities are concerned with money laundering risks. The Australian Transaction Report and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) is currently investigating allegations that TikTok’s payment system was used to transfer the funds from the alleged crimes, particularly after Turkey said large transactions on the social media platform were related to criminal activities. Such allegations have resulted in enhanced focus by regulators across the globe.

Furthermore, TikTok has been banned and has faced legal consequences in several countries including the United States. The platform was blocked by the US authorities, and the issue of the protection of user’s privacy and their data was one of the reasons for this. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a US presidential candidate, has come out against the ban, saying it is an attack on freedom and that the government’s worries are overblown.

TikTok has yet to respond to the latest allegations from the UK. In previous cases, the platform has consistently denied any involvement in illegal activities and emphasized its commitment to compliance with local regulations. A spokesperson for the company has stated that TikTok takes its legal obligations seriously and has implemented strong controls to prevent any misuse of its financial features.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Coinbase pushes for court intervention to obtain SEC documents on crypto regulations

Published

on

By


Coinbase pushes for court intervention to obtain SEC documents on crypto regulations
  • Coinbase seeks SEC documents on crypto regulations through a court ruling.
  • The focus is on Ether’s security status and past closed investigations.
  • SEC delays document release, citing a three-year review process.

Coinbase, a leading US cryptocurrency exchange, has intensified its legal efforts to access crucial documents from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The crypto exchange has asked the US District Court for the District of Columbia for permission to file a motion for partial summary judgment, seeking clarity on how securities laws apply to cryptocurrencies.

The move follows a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in June against both the SEC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Probing what the SEC has on crypto

The requested documents involve internal and external communications concerning the SEC’s investigations into whether specific digital assets, particularly Ether, should be classified as securities.

The classification of Ether (ETH) remains a contentious issue within the industry, with significant implications for the regulatory landscape.

This debate resurfaced when Consensys, a blockchain software firm, filed a lawsuit against the SEC in April, challenging an investigation into “Ethereum 2.0.” The investigation aimed to scrutinize activities involving ether trading, though it was subsequently closed.

Coinbase’s FOIA request also seeks records regarding two completed SEC investigations. One case involved the 2020 settlement with Enigma MPC, a data encryption startup accused of issuing unregistered securities.

The other case concerned Ether Delta, a trading platform established by Zachary Coburn, who reached a settlement with the SEC in 2018 after the platform was deemed to be operating as an unregistered exchange.

Speculation about the SEC concealing discrepancies

Coinbase alleges that the SEC has been uncooperative, first claiming FOIA exemptions and more recently suggesting it would need three years to review the documents. This timeline has been criticized by Coinbase and its consultant, History Associates Inc., for causing undue delays.

The SEC’s reluctance to release documents has fueled speculation about potential discrepancies in how it applies regulatory standards to different entities and projects.

Additionally, Coinbase’s FOIA requests target the FDIC’s “pause letters,” which were issued to financial institutions from March 2022 to May 2023, urging them to halt the expansion of crypto-related activities. The FDIC’s Office of Inspector General had noted these letters in a 2023 report, raising questions about possible coordinated regulatory pressure on the crypto industry, informally dubbed “Operation Choke Point 2.0.”

A judge’s decision on whether Coinbase can proceed with the motion is expected soon, with a ruling potentially coming by year’s end.



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US SEC to Appeal XRP Secondary Sales In Ripple Lawsuit, Says Ex-SEC

Published

on

By


Former SEC official Marc Fagel has indicated that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may appeal the court ruling regarding secondary sales of XRP. This follows a landmark decision which found that primary sales of XRP were not securities. However, Fagel highlighted that the Ripple case did not address secondary market sales, which the SEC might now target.

Ex-SEC Marc Fagel Predicts SEC Appeal in Ripple XRP Case

According to Marc Fagel, the SEC is likely to appeal the decision on the secondary sales of XRP. He emphasized that the previous Ripple court ruling explicitly excluded these sales from its verdict, thus opening a window for the SEC to readdress this issue.

The former SEC official emphasized,

”I’m just saying they’re not foreclosed by the Ripple decision from bringing a case against another entity selling XRP as a security”

Fagel’s commentary sheds light on potential future actions by the SEC, which remains vigilant in interpreting what constitutes security under its jurisdiction.

In response, Lawyer Bill Morgan questioned the rationale behind treating the Bitnomial XRP futures as security futures contracts. He pointed out the inconsistency in regulatory enforcement, especially when comparing XRP to similar cases with Ethereum (ETH), where the SEC had previously shown no objections to the futures contracts.

Morgan expressed frustrations, stating,

“I cannot abide such arbitrary enforcement. No wonder the crypto market is so distorted towards Bitcoin and Ethereum.”

Legal Challenges and Industry Reactions

In addition, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has criticized the SEC’s persistent stance that XRP is a security despite court rulings suggesting otherwise. His criticisms underscore a broader industry frustration over what many see as arbitrary and overreaching regulatory actions. 

Garlinghouse’s comments came after the SEC was perceived as disregarding a judicial decision during its ongoing litigation with the crypto derivatives exchange Bitnomial. In support, Brad promised Ripple would follow up on the developments to hold the commission accountable.

Moreover, the Bitnomial case itself has become a significant point of contention. The exchange has argued that XRP futures should be regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not the SEC. Concurrently, the exchange advocates that XRP is not a security and should not be subjected to such stringent securities laws.

These developments come amid Ripple’s cross-appeal in the ongoing legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This strategic legal move by Ripple aims to address unresolved issues beyond the initial ruling that XRP is not a security. Specifically, the cross-appeal will tackle the broader implications of the SEC’s claims about XRP sales on various exchanges and other distributions, which the SEC had attempted to appeal earlier.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io