Regulation
Senator Cynthia Lummis Critiques US SEC’s Crypto Regulation Approach
Wyoming Senator, Cynthia Lummis, an advocate for digital assets, has criticized the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) handling of cryptocurrency regulations. Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Lummis criticized SEC Chair Gary Gensler for his attitude towards the cryptocurrency market saying it was counterproductive and problematic.
Senator Cynthia Lummis Critiques US SEC’s Crypto Regulation
During the interview, the Senator stressed that the US crypto industry has many problems, which are only accentuated by the current tactics of the SEC. Lummis took aim at SEC Chairman Gary Gensler for his approach to regulating the sector, which she said involved using enforcement actions instead of clear guidelines.
She pointed out that this has resulted in a lot of uncertainty, with many digital asset companies ending up mired in legal disputes instead of being offered clear rules to follow.
According to Senator Cynthia Lummis, the SEC has been a significant hindrance to the further development of the cryptocurrency sector despite the need for regulatory certainty. She pointed out that the current legal framework is insufficient and incapable of catching up with the advancement, especially considering the EU which adopted a complete set of crypto laws in 2023. Lummis noted that the United States might lose its position in the global financial services market if such shortcomings in regulation are not filled as soon as possible.
“Crypto Assets Should Fall Under CFTC Oversight”
Lummis also touched on the category of digital assets and shared her view that Bitcoin and Ethereum are commodities and should fall under CFTC jurisdiction instead of the SEC.
She noted that the SEC strategy, which has tended to categorize digital assets as securities, does not apply to decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Senator Cynthia Lummis also stressed that Congress should step up and come up with proper legislation that would state the scope of different agencies concerning digital assets. She noted that despite the fact that there are still some assets that can be regulated by the CFTC, there is a need to have a clear and current framework for the regulation of the market. She also pointed out that the Howey Test, which is a legal test applied to ascertain whether an asset can be considered a security, may require an update in view of the current developments in the crypto market.
Gary Gensler’s Stance on BTC and ETH
In contrast with Senator Cynthia Lummis, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has maintained that the U.S. already has crypto regulations in place. During an interview, Gensler responded to criticism from industry stakeholders, arguing that “not liking the rules is not the same as there being no rules.”
He insisted that the SEC is focused on protecting investors, noting that many crypto firms have benefited from public interest in digital assets without providing proper disclosures.
Gensler affirmed that Bitcoin is not a security, a stance shared by his predecessor Jay Clayton. This distinction, Gensler noted, allowed the SEC to approve the launch of Bitcoin Spot Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) earlier this year. However, Gensler has remained largely silent on the classification of Ethereum, though its treatment as a commodity has been inferred from regulatory decisions regarding Ethereum ETFs.
Lummis Calls for Changes in Crypto Regulation
According to the Wyoming Senator, these gaps can only be closed by legislation. She cited her plan with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to change the wash sale rule in order to increase the funding for the CFTC and its capacity to regulate the digital asset space.
This proposal, she said, would allow for a more comprehensive approach to regulating the crypto space without jeopardizing its potential.
In addition, Senator Cynthia Lummis and a number of other lawmakers have also expressed concern about the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) that forces crypto custodians to include customer assets as liabilities. In a letter to Gensler, lawmakers demanded that SAB 121 be withdrawn stating that it places undue regulatory restraints on the crypto industry.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Sorare charged for unlicensed gambling services in the UK
- UK Gambling Commission charges Sorare for providing unlicensed gambling services.
- The United Kingdom’s Gambling Commission has been investigating Sorare for three years.
- Sorare denies wrongdoing, asserting it is not a gambling platform under UK law.
The United Kingdom’s Gambling Commission has taken legal action against Sorare, a blockchain-based fantasy sports platform, accusing the company of operating unlicensed gambling facilities.
Sorare, headquartered in France, offers non-fungible tokens (NFTs) tied to fantasy sports teams and athlete collectibles. Following the Gambling Commission’s move, the platform is set to appear in a UK court on October 4.
The Gambling Commission opened its investigation into Sorare in October 2021 but has largely kept its findings under wraps.
As of July 2023, the Commission had not made its conclusions public, instead stating that it would engage in further dialogue with operators and third parties before reaching a final verdict.
The upcoming court battle represents the culmination of nearly three years of regulatory scrutiny.
What is Sorare?
Sorare, founded in 2018, allows users to collect and trade digital cards in the form of NFTs. These cards represent real-life athletes, and users can create fantasy teams to compete based on the players’ real-world performances.
The platform covers multiple sports, including football, basketball, and baseball. Player performance in actual games directly impacts the fantasy teams, making the platform interactive for users.
Sorare’s NFT cards can be traded or sold, sometimes reaching values in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Sorare denies any wrongdoing
In response to the charges, Sorare has firmly denied any wrongdoing.
In a public statement issued by the company’s spokesperson, Sorare has argued that it is not a gambling platform under UK law and criticized the Gambling Commission for misinterpreting its business model.
As quoted by The Guardian, the spokesperson said, “We firmly deny any claims that Sorare is a gambling product under UK laws. The Commission has misunderstood our business and wrongly determined that gambling laws apply to Sorar.”
Sorare has faced legal challenges before, including a similar case in France. In that instance, the company reached a settlement before the matter could proceed to court.
Initially, Sorare only accepted cryptocurrency payments for transactions on its platform. However, in 2023, the company expanded its payment options to include traditional fiat currencies in an effort to increase user adoption.
The outcome of the UK case could have significant implications for Sorare and the broader NFT gaming industry, which continues to blur the lines between collectibles, gaming, and gambling.
Regulation
US SEC Settles With Mango Markets For Unregistered Crypto Sales
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced today that it has settled charges against Mango DAO, Blockworks Foundation, and Mango Labs LLC for their involvement in the unregistered sale of crypto assets on the Mango Markets platform.
The SEC’s enforcement action targets the sale of MNGO governance tokens and alleges that these entities failed to comply with federal securities laws, depriving investors of essential legal protections.
US SEC Settles With Mango Markets
According to the SEC, Mango DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization, and Blockworks Foundation, a Panamanian entity, raised more than $70 million from unregistered offers and sales of MNGO tokens beginning in August 2021.
The tokens, marketed as governance tokens of the Mango Markets platform, were sold to hundreds of investors worldwide, including in the United States. The SEC’s complaint argues that by bypassing registration requirements, the entities did not provide investors with the disclosures and safeguards mandated by U.S. securities laws.
MNGO tokens were promoted as governance tokens intended to provide holders with decision-making power within the Mango Markets ecosystem. However, the SEC maintains that their sale should have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as the tokens were deemed to be securities.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Former US SEC Lawyer Predicts XRP Case Appeal
Eleanor Terrett, a journalist at Fox Business, has noted that a former lawyer from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) believes the SEC will “probably” appeal Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling from July 2023 in the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit.
As the lawyer pointed out, several at the SEC believe that the outcome of Ripple’s programmatic XRP sales is incorrect and must be appealed. The SEC has up to October 7 to file an appeal and this is still a key area to watch as the case progresses.
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit: Former US SEC Lawyer Predicts XRP Case
In the report, the former SEC lawyer revealed that there are many in the agency who still hold the view that Judge Torres got it wrong with the Ripple programmatic XRP sales. This notion may push the agency to seek an appeal especially because they argue that the decision is “not good law.” The lawyer’s comments echo the sentiments of other industry insiders who have pointed out that the SEC may well appeal this decision.
🚨NEW: A former @SECGov lawyer who recently left the agency tells me the SEC will ‘probably’ appeal Judge Torres’s July 2023 ruling concerning the $XRP programmatic sales in the @Ripple case partly because: “everyone over there [at the SEC] truly believes that the decision is…
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 26, 2024
Despite the potential for an appeal, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not dispute the judge’s ruling that XRP itself is not a security. The Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit has garnered significant attention as the SEC’s appeal would likely focus on the classification of programmatic sales and whether they meet the legal standards under the Howey Test, the key criteria for determining investment contracts.
Similarly, another former SEC lawyer, Marc Fagel, noted that an appeal is expected since the filing deadline is near in the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit.
Legal Experts Weigh in on the Case
Several notable figures have commented on the possibility of an appeal. Attorney John Deaton, who has been actively involved in the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit and filed an Amicus Brief on behalf of XRP holders, shared his perspective on the SEC’s chances of success. Deaton argued that Judge Torres’s ruling on programmatic sales was very fact-specific and based on the unique circumstances of the Ripple case.
He noted that while the agency could argue that secondary sales of XRP might meet the Howey Test criteria in other cases, the facts in the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit did not satisfy those standards.
As someone who knows the @Ripple case very well, considering I was an active litigant for over 2 1/2 years, and considering Judge Torres cited my Amicus Brief, and the 3,800 XRP Holder Affidavits I submitted, as well as my efforts, as Amicus Counsel, in the @LBRYcom case (see… https://t.co/Ot7AgoFQh7
— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) September 26, 2024
Deaton also said that even if the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission could overcome the third prong of the Howey Test, it would still need to show that there was a ‘common enterprise’ existed, which was a weak point in the case. Consequently, he estimates that an appeal would be expensive and time-consuming with a low probability of reversing the initial decision. Meanwhile, despite Judge Torres previously ordering Ripple to pay a $125 million penalty, the court issued a stay on the payment pending the outcome of the appeal.
SEC’s Strategy and Investor Protection Concerns
Other lawyers, for instance, Jeremy Hogan, expressed doubts in the US SEC’s intentions if the agency decides to appeal the ruling. Hogan noted that the SEC should concentrate on investor protection and capital formation, with questions being raised if an appeal is consistent with the agency’s mission. Others have stated that the persistence in the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit is a potential diversion for its other regulatory mandates.
I stand by my 60% chance of appeal on the programmatic sales part of the decision. https://t.co/qjKcNhu46Y
— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) September 26, 2024
Furthermore, Bill Morgan has estimated that there is a 60% likelihood that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will appeal the programmatic sales part of the ruling.
Despite all these, Ripple President Monica Long took time to discuss the future of the company and how the court’s decision is beneficial to XRP. Speaking about the verdict in the case, Long said that the victory leads to more certainty and the company is now looking for new business prospects, including the introduction of the RLUSD stablecoin and active work on the XRP Ledger.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Altcoin3 months ago
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
-
NFT2 months ago
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
-
Ethereum1 week ago
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
-
Ethereum1 week ago
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
-
Bitcoin6 days ago
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
-
Blockchain5 months ago
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
NFT4 months ago
BLUR Is Down 30%, And Whales Are To Blame–Here’s Why
-
NFT4 months ago
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
✓ Share: