Connect with us

Bitcoin

Jaw-Dropping Energy Difference Between PoS Altcoins and Bitcoin

Published

on


How green is crypto, really? Activists accuse the industry of environmentally-hazardous side effects, but how true are these claims? What is the environmental impact of crypto?

A new report from UCL, alongside an exclusive interview, addresses these questions and more.

Mining Costs

The alleged environmental costs of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency are an enduring thorn in the industry’s side. Prominent actors frequently debate controversial claims, but crypto enthusiasts are quick to dispute the harshest assertions.

Studies from reputable scientific agencies have repeatedly claimed that mining harms the environment, and this sentiment translates into political anti-crypto sentiment. However, news coverage frequently ignores the community’s best efforts, and exaggerations run rampant.

How can one make sense of all this? What are the charges of crypto’s environmental impact, and how serious are they?

To help answer some of these questions, BeInCrypto conducted an exclusive interview with Wes Geisenberger, VP of Sustainability and ESG at Hedera, a decentralized public ledger and stablecoin issuer. The firm seeks to stand above its Web3 competitors in terms of carbon footprint and sustainability.

Interestingly, Hedera is a partner of the UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, whose new reports on crypto’s environmental impact cast doubt on the proof-of-stake model altogether.

PoW or PoS

The heart of UCL’s new report is on the notion that Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains are uniformly more environmentally friendly than Proof-of-Work (PoW) ones.

PoW protocols like Bitcoin are fully trustless and decentralized, and transactions are validated through a competitive network of miners. These equations solved by miners’ collective computing power update the blockchain and generate new coins, but different miners have an inherently adversarial relationship.

For PoS protocols like Ethereum, however, the blockchain processes transactions differently. Using validators instead of miners, new block creators must “stake” their own tokens rather than computational power, allowing for a more collaborative experience. This, allegedly, makes the mining experience more efficient.

Read more: Proof of Work and Proof of Stake Explained

According to PoW advocates, the main drawback of the latter system is that it is much more prone to centralization. Nonetheless, UCL’s new report seeks to interrogate these claims more closely.

Are all PoS blockchains created equal? If these protocols are greener than PoW, how much greener are they? What are the best ways that the industry can face these challenges head on?

As far as Geisenberger is concerned, the entire space “has a responsibility to understand its impact on the world around us and in particular the environment.” He added that “we need to measure our impacts like the rest of the financial and technology world, built on standards and in an easily comparable way. There’s also a need to extend that to better understand the impact of how technologies, treasuries, and users leverage their resources to achieve positive impact.”

If the crypto ecosystem wants to impact our natural ecosystem, attitudes like this are crucial.

Bitcoin’s Waste

Some of the bitterest arguments over crypto’s ecological impact center around Bitcoin, the first and largest cryptocurrency. The debates over Bitcoin often take place on the same well-trodden territory: what percentage of mining electricity is renewable? Do techniques like flared gas mining constitute green energy or not?

Bitcoin’s biggest advocates are quick to point out all the massive green energy use cases that literally power the industry. Hydroelectric operations can sell excess energy in low-demand periods, productively using clean power that would otherwise go to waste. Flared gas mining is similar, with an inevitable waste product of the petrochemical industry getting a new use.

Aren’t Bitcoin’s critics eager to paint its impact in the most damning light possible? That may or may not be true, but UCL asserts that even the rosiest picture is still pretty grim.

Bitcoin vs Altcoins Energy Waste
Bitcoin vs Altcoins Energy Waste. Source: UCL

As the data shows, Bitcoin stands head-and-shoulders above all PoS blockchains surveyed in terms of electrical consumption. The study concluded that “all of the PoS-based DLTs (Distributed Ledger Tokens) analyzed have an energy consumption that is negligible compared to that of major PoW blockchains. To the extent that energy consumption may be considered problematic, this is not an issue in any PoS design.”

The study lists a number of limitations in its methodology and was not able to nail down a primary cause for these discrepancies. Still, as Geisenberger put it, “task forces across the industry [are] created to answer difficult questions in increased regulatory and voluntary disclosures in carbon accounting.”

A wide range of organizations are tackling these and other questions, and their results contribute to a greater scientific consensus.

Looking Forward

Ultimately, environmental impacts in the industry are a very controversial issue, and bad-faith actors exacerbate it. Both pro- and anti-crypto advocates can twist meanings and misinterpret studies, especially for concrete political ends.

PoW supporters have legitimate concerns besides the environmental, too, further complicating the issue. If PoS blockchains are not truly decentralized, does it matter if their energy consumption is lower? If PoW consumes energy that would otherwise be “wasted,” are its higher costs negated?

The crypto community must grapple with these and other questions for years to come. Luckily, with an innovative spirit and dedicated researchers like those at UCL, we’re sure to meet the challenge.

Disclaimer

Following the Trust Project guidelines, this feature article presents opinions and perspectives from industry experts or individuals. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its staff. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Bitcoin

Lummis Confirms Treasury Probes Direct Buys

Published

on


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In an interview with Bitcoin commentator Natalie Brunell, Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) reaffirmed her commitment to establishing a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), disclosing that the Treasury Department is probing its legal authority to purchase and custody BTC on behalf of the federal government. The senator believes such a move could significantly reduce the national debt over the long term.

Senator Lummis Pushes Bitcoin Reserve

Lummis pointed to roughly 200,000 BTC in the US Marshals Service’s asset forfeiture program as a possible starting point: “Working with Treasury, and the Treasury Secretary, we’re trying to find out which assets among those could become the basis of the first year’s investment in a strategic Bitcoin reserve.”

Further clarifying her stance, the senator noted she is determining whether a new law is required or if the administration already has the authority: “What I’m trying to figure out right now is whether it needs to be done legislatively or whether the Treasury Secretary has the authority to do it right now.”

Lummis proposes converting the seized BTC into an official “base investment,” which she says would be the foundation of a larger BTC reserve. If successful, this would mark the first time the US government deliberately and openly accumulated Bitcoin as a strategic asset.

One of Lummis’ main arguments for a SBR is its capacity to trim the federal debt, which she deems “irresponsibly high.” Under her Bitcoin Act, the US could also revalue its gold certificates—currently listed at a decades-old official price of $42 per ounce, far below market value—and deploy the difference toward purchasing BTC in a budget neutral way:

“My legislation would provide that we could take our gold certificates… bring them up to current fair market value for gold and then use that to buy Bitcoin, thereby creating a 1 million Bitcoin reserve over five years.”

She contends that holding this million BTC over a 20-year horizon could “cut the current national debt in half.” Citing extensive modeling—some from advocates like Michael Saylor—she believes the price appreciation of BTC has the potential to deliver significant gains to taxpayers.

The senator lauded President Trump’s recent executive orders that aim to make the United States “the digital asset capital of the world” by fostering a favorable environment for BTC mining, regulatory clarity, and a strategic reserve. According to Lummis, those moves stand in stark contrast to prior administrations, where “people neither knew nor wanted to talk about digital assets.”

However, Lummis also underscored the need for bipartisan collaboration, suggesting that while Bitcoin has now garnered interest in Republican circles, it should not become a strictly partisan endeavor: “We want to keep that momentum… We worked extremely hard to keep it bipartisan, so I can’t flip my brain and start to think of it as a partisan issue.”

At press time, BTC traded at $84,202.

Bitcoin price
BTC hovers above $84,000, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.





Source link

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Tokenized Gold Market Cap Tops $1.2 Billion as Gold Prices Surge

Published

on


The market cap of tokenized gold has surpassed $1.2 billion, driven by soaring gold prices and a growing appetite for blockchain-based assets.

Rising interest in tokenized gold is part of a broader movement to modernize storage, trading, and utilization in financial markets.

Gold Meets Blockchain Amid Tokenization Revolution

Gold price has reached historic highs above $3,000 per ounce. With this surge, digital representations of precious metals, such as Tether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG), capture investor interest.

Gold price performance
Gold price performance. Source: TradingView

Don Tapscott, co-founder of Blockchain Research Institute, argues that tokenized gold could transform the $13 trillion gold market by bringing transparency, liquidity, and new financial models.

Based on this assumption, he questioned why gold is still stored in vaults as it was in the 1800s. Meanwhile, assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and stablecoins have gone digital. He believes blockchain technology can revolutionize gold’s role in finance.

“The US government could even tokenize its gold reserves, track them immutably, and use them in innovative ways,” Tapscott explained.

He stated that such an outcome would enable fractional ownership, on-chain verification, and increased accessibility to investors worldwide.  

Meanwhile, companies such as Paxos and Tether lead the charge in tokenized gold offerings. Paxos holds a 51.74% market share, while Tether’s holdings follow closely behind at 46.69%.

Tokenized gold holdings
Tokenized gold holdings. Source: rwa.xyz

Publicly listed Matador Technologies is taking a unique approach by tokenizing gold on the Bitcoin blockchain. This offers investors a digital claim on both physical gold and limited-edition digital art.

“We believe that the next generation of financial powerhouses will likely emerge from the tokenization revolution. It’s still early, and the playing field is wide open. Matador and others have the bull by the horns,” Tapscott noted in a recent article.

Gold Tokenization in the US: A Bold Policy Shift?

The momentum behind tokenized gold has also reached the US government. Following President Trump’s March 5 executive order to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), policymakers are exploring ways to modernize gold holdings.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has indicated that the US will move to “monetize its assets,” leading some to speculate that Fort Knox gold could be tokenized.

“US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says, all the GOLD is there, as he has no plans to visit Fort Knox or to revalue GOLD reserves in a sovereign wealth fund. He speaks on “Bloomberg Surveillance,” Erik Yeung noted.

Senator Cynthia Lummis has also proposed swapping some of the US government’s gold reserves for Bitcoin. US gold reserves are held at a book value of $42 per ounce—unchanged since 1973—despite the market price exceeding $3,000 per ounce.

While the US explores tokenization, geopolitical rivals China and Russia may take an even bolder step—launching a gold-backed stablecoin. Bitcoin maximalist Max Keiser recently highlighted BRICS’ plans to introduce a gold-backed stablecoin.

“The BRICS, principally Russia, China & India, will counter any attempt by the US to introduce a hegemonic, USD-backed stablecoin — with a Gold-backed stablecoin. The majority of the global market will favor a Gold-backed coin since it’s inflation-proof (unlike the USD) and doesn’t boost unwelcome US hegemony. India already runs on a defacto Gold standard and Sharia law in Muslim countries would dictate Gold over a USD riba-coin as well. To be clear, a BTC-backed stablecoin is not fit for purpose due to volatility,” Keiser stated.

Further, Keiser suggested that a stablecoin backed by gold would outcompete USD-backed stablecoins in global markets. He argues that gold is more trusted than the US dollar, tracks inflation effectively, and remains minimally volatile compared to Bitcoin’s price swings.

Russia’s recent rejection of Bitcoin for its National Wealth Fund in favor of gold and the Chinese yuan adds weight to this theory.

With an estimated 50,000 tonnes of combined gold reserves, China and Russia could leverage blockchain technology to introduce a new gold-backed digital asset. Such an action would challenge the US dollar’s dominance in global trade.

Gold vs. Bitcoin: The Safe Haven Debate Intensifies

Gold’s record-breaking rally has reignited debates over its role as a safe-haven asset compared to Bitcoin. Some analysts speculate that Bitcoin could soon follow gold’s trajectory, setting new all-time highs.

However, in economic uncertainty and President Trump’s 2025 tariff policies, gold remains the preferred safe-haven asset. Historically, gold has been the go-to store of value during trade wars and inflationary periods. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s volatility raises concerns for risk-averse investors.

Despite these differences, the rise of tokenized gold highlights a convergence between traditional and digital finance. As financial markets advance and investors rebalance their portfolios, gold and Bitcoin will likely coexist in a contemporary monetary system.

Whether through tokenization, gold-backed stablecoins, or government-led blockchain initiatives, the financial playing field is shifting.

As traditional institutions increasingly adopt blockchain, the stage is set for transforming how the world perceives, trades, and stores gold relative to Bitcoin.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Institutional Risk Aversion Drives $218 Million Bitcoin ETF Outflows

Published

on


Bitcoin ETFs (exchange-traded funds) continue to record negative flows this week as President Trump’s Liberation Day countdown continues.

Sentiment is cautious across crypto markets, with traders and investors adopting a wait-and-see approach.

Bitcoin ETF See Outflows Amid Investor Caution

Data on Farside Investors shows two consecutive days of net outflows for Bitcoin ETFs since Monday. Financial instruments from Bitwise (BITB), Ark Invest (ARKB), and WisdomTree (BTCW) were in the frontline for Monday’s $60.6 million outflows, with only BlackRock’s IBIT seeing positive flows.

Meanwhile, Tuesday saw even more outflows, approaching $158 million, with Bitwise and Ark Invest leading the charge. Then, on April 1, BlackRock’s IBIT recorded zero flows. Meanwhile, Ethereum ETFs recorded net outflows of $3.6 million, data on Farside shows. This suggests a cautious sentiment among institutional investors.

“The Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $157.8 million outflow yesterday. The Spot Ethereum ETFs saw a $3.6 million outflow. Institutions are reducing risk ahead of today’s tariff announcement,” analyst Crypto Rover noted.

Bitcoin ETF flows this week
Bitcoin ETF flows. Source: Farside Investors

Indeed, sentiment suggests traders are exercising caution, choosing to remain in “wait-and-see” mode. The caution comes ahead of Trump’s Liberation Day announcement, which is due later in the day on April 2.

With POTUS poised to unveil sweeping new tariffs, traders and investors across financial playing fields wait to see the scope of an onslaught that could spark a global trade war. Specifically, there is generally very little information about the tariffs’ specifics, which creates uncertainty regarding their impact on the broader economy and the crypto market. 

“The White House has not reached a firm decision on their tariff plan,” Bloomberg reported, citing people close to the matter.

Despite the lack of clarity, it is understandable why investors would be cautious considering the impact of previous tariff announcements on Bitcoin price. Meanwhile, analysts predict extreme market volatility, with potential stock and crypto crashes reaching 10-15% if Trump enforces broad tariffs.

“April 2nd is similar to election night. It is the biggest event of the year by an order of magnitude. 10x more important than any FOMC, which is a lot. And anything can happen,” economic analyst Alex Krüger predicted.

While sentiment is cautious in the crypto market, some investors are channeling toward gold as a safe haven. A Bank of America survey showed that 58% of fund managers prefer gold as a trade war safe haven, while only 3% back Bitcoin.

These findings came as institutional investors cite Bitcoin’s volatility and limited crisis-time liquidity as key barriers to its safe-haven adoption. Trade tensions have historically driven capital into safe-haven assets.

With Trump’s Liberation Day announcement looming, investors preemptively position themselves again, favoring gold over Bitcoin.

Nevertheless, despite Bitcoin’s struggle to capture institutional safe-haven flows, its long-term narrative remains intact. This is seen with Bitcoin supply on exchanges dropping to just 7.53%, the lowest since February 2018.

Bitcoin supply on exchanges
Bitcoin supply on exchanges. Source: Santiment

When an asset’s supply on exchanges reduces, investors are unwilling to sell, suggesting strong long-term holder confidence.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io